<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dropbox Spammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cloudmark.com/2012/07/18/the-dropbox-spammer-owned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cloudmark.com/2012/07/18/the-dropbox-spammer-owned/</link>
	<description>Intelligence Briefings from the War on Spam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Medos</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmark.com/2012/07/18/the-dropbox-spammer-owned/comment-page-1/#comment-109999</link>
		<dc:creator>John Medos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmark.com/?p=1719#comment-109999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I do not see the big issue in the fact we have received spam messages. We got loads of them anyway (thanks to the antispam filters for catching 99% of them). I think the problem here is that someone (the spammer) got e-mail addresses (private information in general) from Dropbox. We can only hope and trust that there is some simple answer how that happened and that there is no serious security breach out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I do not see the big issue in the fact we have received spam messages. We got loads of them anyway (thanks to the antispam filters for catching 99% of them). I think the problem here is that someone (the spammer) got e-mail addresses (private information in general) from Dropbox. We can only hope and trust that there is some simple answer how that happened and that there is no serious security breach out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropbox Related Spam Leads Some to Speculate About Breach &#124; News</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmark.com/2012/07/18/the-dropbox-spammer-owned/comment-page-1/#comment-104733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dropbox Related Spam Leads Some to Speculate About Breach &#124; News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmark.com/?p=1719#comment-104733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Commenting on the reports, Cloudmark said that recent data from their Global Threat Network showed 364 different domains in use by this spammer. “Some of the domains point to an IP address shared with domains that have been seen by our system in prior spam campaigns as far back as 2008. So this is a long way from a new campaign,” the anti-spam company explained. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #efefef; padding: 5px">
<p>[...] Commenting on the reports, Cloudmark said that recent data from their Global Threat Network showed 364 different domains in use by this spammer. “Some of the domains point to an IP address shared with domains that have been seen by our system in prior spam campaigns as far back as 2008. So this is a long way from a new campaign,” the anti-spam company explained. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
